Monday, November 24, 2008

Going the Extra Mile

Just read this post from the Freeport School District Newsletter. There are definitely some exemplary teachers and "retired" teachers in our district. Heidi Downing is one such example. I was fortunate enough to have a daughter, who had her for a teacher. A good time to accenutate the positive:


Hooray for Heidi
From the Desk of Danielle Summers, Principal of Center School
Early last week (two weeks ago), Heidi Downing* subbed for Barb Kerr in the
afternoon. Students were finishing up, a quite intense and extensive, project.
On Thursday, Heidi was on her way to Rockford to spend time for herself by shopping.
(That is what retirement is all about.)
On the way, Heidi became more and more upset by the article she read in the paper that morning. The article was information on the Equity Data Presentation from Wednesday night. What bothered her most was the information on the district’s African American males and how they begin to fall behind early in their school careers. Heidi turned her car around and came to Center School. From subbing earlier in the week, she knew three African American boys were behind in a project. She spent three hours working with these boys to complete their project. The finished project was amazing. In addition to the project, Heidi read the equity article with the boys and talked about the young African American man on the front page, who is a former HAPP student and who has accomplished much.

It is that kind of dedication to students and desire to see students succeed that makes our district so wonderful. And especially makes Heidi so wonderful.
Heidi: Thank you so much for making a difference!

* Heidi retired from the school district a few years ago after a dedicated career as a teacher, HAPP leader, FEA leader and strong proponent for equity issues. Thankfully, she remains involved in our school district.

There are a number of such examples that often are overlooked due to the other issues within our district. I still question the wording of the administration in their response to the high school falling below the state standards, "because of the special needs" children and their test scores. As the parent of a child with "special needs" who cannot take standardized tests due to a low intelligence quotient, how does this factor into the scoring by the state. Are all children with IEP's put into the same category? Does a child with ADD or ADHD, who can test with certain accommodations get put into the same category as a child with severe mental retardation or altered cognitive abilities? How are these differences accounted for within the district and with state standardized tests, that are used to determine state funding for the schools?

No Chiild Left Behind has been a blatant failure for our district and for the country. There is no way that one standard can be used for all students.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

The Day After, Locally

It has become apparent that in Northwest Illinois we are staunchly Republican on the local level. The overwhelming victories by Sen. Bivins, Congressman Sacia, and U.S. Representative Manzullo. The election in Stephenson County mirrored the national percentages in voting for Sen. Obama over Sen. McCain. This is the first time that I am aware of that our county has voted in favor of a Democratic presidential nominee over a Republican.

The City of Freeport, which is extremely slow to change or to accept new concepts and ideas, voted overwhelmingly (65% to 35%) to stay with the Mayor-Council form of government instead of looking toward the future of our economic livelihood and strongly consider a City Manager-Mayor-Council form. We either embrace our candidates for their outgoing personality, even if the city is eroding around us, or kick them out if our taxes are raised to an uncomfortable level.

What does any of this portend for our local economy in a time when our major employers, such as MetLife, let more employees go, including ones that had been there for more than 40 years and had dedicated their lives to the company? We see the bright and shiny new retail stores like Wal-Mart, Menards, and the refurbished Farm and Fleet, but these are not "new" businesses to our area. These are expanded companies, who are now letting their new hires go as the economy continues to slide and the stores reach a point of balanced business (the initial traffic flow has leveled off).

We are landlocked in Freeport with no major expressways nearby (think Rochelle and I-88 and I-39) and no four-lane highway to our West. This has severely limited our ability to grow in population or in business. We are now at a 6.9% unemployment rate compared with 4.8% one year ago, as of September. Of course, this isn't helped by the 8.9% rate in Winnebago County, where many of our residents work. How many more unemployed do we have that are now on other forms of subsidized income who no longer qualify for unemployment benefits?

There are many aspects of our city and county that are in need of assistance, whether through the government or local business initiatives. There is definitely a need for the two to be working together for the area and not have people so consumed with personal approval ratings or image, but who get things done with the general good of the economy and standard of living not taking a backseat to the next election.

Thoughts on the Day After

Found this while looking through various blogs about the election. Thought it was an interesting post which highlights the symmetrical and cyclical nature of American politics:

Conservative blogger Rod Dreher notes:

1. The modern conservative movement began with the crushing defeat of Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater in the 1964 presidential race. The modern conservative movement ends with the crushing defeat of Arizona Sen. John McCain -- who took Goldwater's Senate seat upon his retirement -- in the 2008 presidential race.

2. Modern liberalism began its implosion with riots in Chicago's Grant Park at the 1968 Democratic Convention. Tonight, modern liberalism is reborn at Chicago's Grant Park, where a black Chicago Democrat will celebrate winning the presidency.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Obama Wins Election

As the final days of the campaign ran its course, there was the distinct feeling that Senator Barack Obama of our state of Illinois would win the election. In another online discussion group, I predicted that Sen. Obama would win 338 Electoral College Votes. While I fully supported Senator John McCain for his abilities in National security issues and especially for his stance on the pro-life issue, I am an American and appreciate that the country of Lincoln fought for the rights of any American of the appropriate age to run for President. There is to be no encumbrance to race, color or religious affiliation when running for the highest office in the land.

I wish Senator Obama well. I do hope that he moves more toward the centrist, conservative demeanor that he displayed at Harvard (according to Professor Ogletree his former mentor at Harvard Law School). It came down to the primary reasons of the economy (doesn't it usually?) and the ability to link Senator McCain with the Bush presidency.

Now there is the hope that the Senate does not become a supermajority with 60 Democrats, or perhaps that would be a good thing, because then we can see if the Democrats can solve the nation's woes and not have partisanship to blame for any failures to "change" our country for the better.

I am guessing that no one will mispronounce his name like I predicted almost four years ago prior to President Bush's second inauguration in 2005, when Senator Kennedy called him Senator Osama.

We'll see if we start moving in a positive direction.

Monday, November 03, 2008

It Is Time to Vote

Column first appeared in Village Voices on October 28, 2008

At the Crossroads
By
Roland Tolliver

“Life is lived forward, but can only be understood backwards.” --Søren Kierkegaard

The nation is at a crossroads. Oil prices fluctuate and long lines at the gas pumps are happening in parts of our country. There is turmoil in the Middle East with continued concerns about Iran. The Republican candidate is a balding, white male, military veteran, who is trying to distance himself from a President with an abysmal approval rating. Saturday Night Live has lampooned a national candidate to the point of turning the party representative into a mockery. A vice-presidential candidate was selected to appease the conservatives. On the other side, a smooth talking liberal candidate is the nominee from the Democratic Party. He has little experience at the national or international levels, but has brought in a long-term U.S. Senator to cover his weaknesses. The economy is in the dumps with the possibility of inflation and depression both looming large. The Presidential election is just days away.

The year was 1976. Gerald Ford, the man who was appointed to the Presidency, was running against the upstart Democratic nominee, Jimmy Carter. The nation wanted to distance itself from Richard Nixon, and anybody associated with him. Walter Mondale, the long-time Democratic Senator from Minnesota, was nominated as the Vice-Presidential candidate, seen as someone who could shore up the party’s ticket. Gerald Ford was lampooned by Chevy Chase of SNL, who made a career out of his one-note comedic bludgeoning of a single misstep on a runway in Austria, dismissing the fact that Ford was probably the most athletic President in history. Senator Bob Dole was the V.P. nominee, who appealed to the more conservative constituency.

It was my first election. I had turned eighteen that year. I was a political junkie from the time I was in the fourth or fifth grade, even to the point of charting the Electoral College votes the night of the 1968 election. My parents thought I was prescient when I predicted that Nixon would name Gerald Ford from our home state of Michigan as his Vice President when it was apparent that the disgraced Spriro Agnew would be leaving office. I was also torn in trying to make my first major decision as a voting adult.

Today we find a number of parallels to 1976. We have a tested politician who has chosen a more conservative candidate to be his running mate. We have an untested, but smooth-talking candidate, who has chosen a long-term Senator as his running mate to balance his inexperience in foreign affairs. We have the coming inflationary economy that is in a recession. Gas prices are fluctuating on an almost daily basis. Iran is threatening Israel and there is continued instability in the Middle East. And not the least is America’s desire to distance itself from an unpopular President and the other party doing its best to connect the Republican Presidential nominee and the current President for their own political gain.

The four years of the Carter administration were most-likely one of the lowest points in the history of our country’s standing in the world. We were perceived as weak. Our military was decimated by the desire to try and be the anti-war nation, having been disillusioned by the Vietnam War. Our economy soured and gas prices skyrocketed with long gas lines and rationing. The one international event that stands above any other during that time was the Iranian Hostage Crisis with the subsequent tragedy in the ill-fated rescue attempt. “Carter’s Blackest Day” was the headline in the daily paper in Munich (where I was studying) on April 25, 1980, the day after the failed “Operation Eagle Claw” and the death of eight of our finest soldiers in Iran the day before. And now Senator Biden informs us that if his running mate is elected President, he will be tested with an international crisis within the first six months of his Presidency.

The parallels are many and we have been informed many times throughout the years by Winston Churchill and others that if we fail to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. Despite President Bush’s misgivings and shortcomings, there has not been another attack on U.S. soil since the tragic events of September 11, 2001. We have not located Osama Bin Laden and perhaps we never will regardless of who is elected President. We are in an unpopular war, but when is war ever popular? The current candidates want to stop genocide and other atrocities in other parts of the world, and that was accomplished to a large degree in Iraq with the capture and ouster of Saddam Hussein, but due to the misguided pretenses of attacking terrorists in Iraq, this fact is often overlooked.

There is still much work to be done with the economy, in fostering world peace, in protecting innocent lives here and abroad, and protecting our own shores. Despite the campaign rhetoric and baseless promises for change, the winner will still have to work with Congress to pass any sweeping changes. As a country, we move more at the rate of an ocean liner than a speed boat when it comes to change. There is no modern-day prophet or single individual who accomplishes all he or she sets out to do and definitely not in four years’ time.

I voted in 1976 based on my enthusiasm of the moment. I went with the new guy, against my deeper gut feeling that I should vote for President Ford. I listened to the promises and the rhetoric. I was young and highly impressionable. I learned a valuable lesson that I have taken with me each subsequent election. I vote independent of party line locally, but have voted for a Republican for President since that impetuous decision in 1976. I have a feeling we may have another difficult lesson to learn in the next few years, but as a country we will survive either way.

Presidential Candidates' Health

Column first published in Village Voices, October 14, 2008

Fit for Office

By

Roland Tolliver

"John F. Kennedy has not, nor has he ever, had … Addison's disease." --Dr. Janet Travell, President Kennedy's Personal Physician

In this, the age of HIPPA laws and medical disclosure issues, Americans want to know about the health status of their elected officials, especially the President. This has now carried over, and with good reason, to the candidates who are running for President of the United States. The health of the candidates for Vice-President also presents intriguing questions, but not to the same extreme. The forthrightness of past nominees has been questionable at best, including several Presidents whose near-incapacitation or inability to lead were masked or hidden by their doctors and personal assistants.

The above example for then Senator Kennedy is one of the most blatant and glaring in regards to Presidential candidates. While JFK is often revered as one of our great Presidents, he most likely would have never been voted in if there had been full disclosure of his health problems. It has been revealed that he was thought to be addicted to painkillers because of chronic back pain. He had full-blown Addison's disease (a condition that affects the adrenal gland and requires cortisone to allow the body to function) since 1947, but that fact was hidden from the public. There were multiple other medical conditions that afflicted Senator Kennedy, but these were hidden from the public in his campaign's desire to project a youthful, energetic candidate to the country. The first televised debate in 1960 only accentuated that persona to the public and allowed JFK to become President.

Kennedy's successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, was initially just as secretive, by minimizing a heart attack in 1955 and downplaying his gall bladder attacks. He did eventually seek counsel from President Eisenhower, who had had multiple medical problems during his two terms in office during the 1950's. He instructed President Johnson to let the American people know about his medical status. LBJ went so far as to reveal his "gall bladder surgery scar" during a press conference.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower not only suffered a heart attack in 1955 during his first term in office, but had severe Crohn's disease, which required surgery in 1956 and had a stroke in 1957, which left him with a slight speech impediment.

It has been well-documented that President Ronald Reagan developed Alzheimer's disease, which many people have determined probably manifested toward the end of his second term. It is also well-known that his successor, President George H. W. Bush, has Grave's disease, which affects the thyroid gland.

Throughout the history of our country, as well as country's around the world, the health of many nations' leaders has come into question at different times. Fidel Castro, Boris Yeltsin, and Kim Yong Il among others have been or were kept out of the public eye when seriously ill in order to "protect" them from those who had suspicions of their ability or inability to lead. While dictatorial countries and communist regimes often operate under a veil of secrecy, our own government has done this over the years when it has come to our own presidents' health concerns.

The questions concerning our current presidential candidates' health continue to be asked by journalists, physician panels, and the electorate. Is John McCain, who will be 72 on Inauguration Day, too old for the presidency? Does his history of hypertension (high blood pressure), high cholesterol, and previous bouts with melanomas lead one to believe that he may not survive even one term in office? Will people take into account that current actuarial tables (while only an indicator and obviously not a prognosticator of actual lifelines) indicate that he will most likely live at least another twelve years? Do voters look at the fact that his mother is still living vibrantly at age 96? Will we stop to consider that he has survived a Vietnamese prison camp and has now led a full life of service to his country? Of course, the job of President of the United States has taken a toll on the last two Presidents. Just look at photos of Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush before and after taking office.

Most people look at the Democratic Presidential nominee, Senator Barack Obama, and imagine that he is the picture of health. He is slim, plays pick-up basketball regularly, and is said to eat relatively healthy food choices with little or no excess fats or junk food. What is often overlooked is his addiction to nicotine and his frequent relapses in regards to the use of tobacco. There have been many people in their forties and fifties who appear healthy, that succumb to the effects of smoking, including heart attacks, cancer of the throat, mouth, and lungs among other types, as well as emphysema and related breathing disorders. His mother died of cancer at the age of 52.

There are many issues on which this presidential campaign will be decided. There are also many questions about a candidate's health that are legitimate. Few journalists will dig very deep into the 1,500 plus pages of medical information that Senator McCain released, just as few will go beyond the one page "I'm normal" news release that came from Senator Obama's campaign headquarters. If there are underlying medical conditions that truly affect one's ability to lead the country and make the critical decisions that are required on a daily basis, then these should be fully disclosed, because it is important when making the choice at the ballot box.

If the non-issue health concerns are blown out of proportion only for the chance to question one's ability to lead, then these need to be critically addressed by qualified individuals in order to substantiate the findings or to discredit them, whichever provides the true answer. We can no longer fall prey to the whims of a candidate's handlers, who in the past insulated the candidate and his medical conditions from the general public, and vote blindly. If it is of no consequence, then vote for the best man and/or woman. If it is, and we don't know until after the fact, then we better be sure that the Vice-President's health is in order.

Cubs Playoff Woes

First Appeared in The Focus on October 9, 2008

I Can’t Believe I Watched the Whole Thing!

By

Roland Tolliver

“Chicago Cubs fans are ninety percent scar tissue.” --George Will



The year was 1968 and I was helping to head up the mock election for President in our elementary school. It was the year of Richard M. Nixon and Hubert H. Humphrey. It was also, for all of us living in Michigan, “The Year of the Tigers.” As crucial as the upcoming election was, and believe me, the campaign lasted nowhere near as long as the current one, life was put on hold for Carlson Elementary School. I know it is ancient history for some, but this was in the days before a television - complete with cable - in every classroom. It was the only time during my thirteen years in public education that a television was brought into the room in order for the class to watch the World Series games involving the Detroit Tigers and the St. Louis Cardinals. Mr. Kemp allowed us to hang on every pitch, as the games were played during the daytime then. Television didn’t control the schedule in those days.

This past week, we once again put a political campaign on the backburner, the Palin-Biden debate notwithstanding, in order to watch hometown teams compete in the Major League playoffs. The Tigers faded this year faster than a complete sentence by Ron Santo when the Cubs make an error. Not since 1906 had both the Cubs and the White Sox been in the postseason at the same time. Chicago and Illinois were gung-ho a week ago. The Cubs had won the Central Division and had the best record in the National League and with it, home field advantage throughout the playoffs. The Sox took two extra days to secure a place among the final eight teams.

And then a strange feeling a déjà-Blue came over Cub fans throughout the area and the country. We watched the first game and cheered when Mark DeRosa hit a two-run home run into the right field bleachers. Ron Santo continually reminded us that “this is the year!” We were given that hope, that belief, that thrill of anticipation that we were on our way. Ryan “Home Field Rules” Dempster was on the mound and the wind was blowing in. Somehow, some way, though, the wind seemed to blow the ball every which way but over the plate. Walk the bases loaded and then … Loney Tunes … James Loney (who?) launches one over the center field wall and it is the “grand salami.” Bases cleared, Cub fans sigh, and we never lead again in the entire series. I watched each inning, staying up until late in the night, hoping, wishing, cajoling, and the end result was another year without a playoff win.

Only four teams have been swept two years in a row in the playoffs. The Cubs are now one of them. Only two teams had the best record in the National League and then were swept in the first round of the playoffs. The Cubs are now one of those two. The games were disheartening, disappointing and devoid of any of the fun-filled action that they displayed throughout the regular season. We couldn’t pitch when we needed to. We couldn’t hit when men were on base. We couldn’t field when the ball was hit to us.

I know that “we” weren’t on the field or at the plate or in the dugout, but “we” have been behind the team during this magical year, hanging on every curve ball, every home run, every anxious moment. And “we” were the ones that couldn’t afford playoff tickets and sat home and watched each pitch and garnered a greater and greater feeling of dread whenever Alfonso Soriano came to the plate or when a runner was on base and we could sense the impending double-play ball would be hit by one of our players. We could see the Cubs sitting on their hands with their heads down while on the bench or see them with their gloves up when the ball was down when they were on the field.

No matter what superstition or lucky charm or magical field was invoked or which god was prayed to or how many times the dugout was blessed, a team has to be able to hit, throw, and catch a baseball better than the other team. The Cubs didn’t do that and once again we must “wait till next year.” Now it is 101 years and counting.

The Tigers went on to stun the Cardinals in the 1968 World Series after being down three games to one. Hubert Humphrey won our school’s mock election, though not the real one. Denny McLain, who would be the last pitcher to win 30 games in a year, would eventually leave the game in disgrace after being traded to the Washington Senators, as would the winner of that year’s election, Richard Nixon, who was ironically also dismissed from Washington, D.C. in disgrace. Some events in life are difficult to predict, much like trying to figure out when the Cubs will win their next World Series.

Now, it is back to the election season (though the White Sox just won to stay alive in the playoffs as I write this on Sunday evening) and there is once again a major decision to be made about leadership in our country. But before that day arrives … “Hey, Lou! Why didn’t you put Fontenot at second to start the series and put DeRosa in right? Could you talk to Soriano about not swinging at everything within his sight line? Why didn’t you take out Dempster and put in Marshall after Ryan’s fourth walk? Will ‘Big Z’ ever grow up? What’s up with Derrick ‘Double Play’ Lee when a man’s on base?” So many questions, so much off-season time …